February 2026

AI Innovation vs Cyber Risk: What Businesses Must Learn from the 2026 AI Summit

AI Innovation vs Cyber Risk: What Businesses Must Learn from the 2026 AI Summit The 2026 AI Summit brought together industry leaders, cybersecurity experts, and AI innovators to address one of the most pressing challenges of our time: how to balance AI-driven innovation with emerging cyber risks. AI is reshaping business operations, workflows, and threat landscapes across industries. But with this transformation comes a new category of cyber risks that demand proactive defenses and strategic governance. 1. AI Is Accelerating Innovation Faster Than Regulations A major theme at the summit was the speed of AI adoption: AI tools are enabling automation, predictive analytics, threat detection, process optimization, and customer personalization. But regulatory frameworks such as data privacy, AI ethics, and cybersecurity requirements are struggling to keep pace. Businesses must understand that innovation without guardrails can create vulnerabilities, especially when AI systems interact with sensitive data or automate critical decisions. Action for businesses: Establish clear governance policies for AI initiatives to ensure compliance and safety from the outset. 2. AI Is Both a Cyber Defense Tool and a Cyber Threat Multiplier Summit experts emphasized a dual reality: AI strengthens cyber defense by: Detecting anomalies faster than traditional tools Reducing response times Predicting attack patterns Automating threat hunting But AI also empowers attackers to: Create adaptive malware Automate phishing attacks at scale Generate deepfakes for social engineering Bypass legacy detection systems The takeaway? AI alone is not enough: Human + AI collaboration is the most effective defense. 3. AI Systems Must Be Designed with Security by Default Security cannot be an afterthought. The summit stressed: Integrating security into AI development lifecycles Performing continuous testing of models (e.g., adversarial testing) Monitoring model inputs and outputs for anomalies Ensuring AI models are resilient against data poisoning and manipulation AI that learns from unsafe or manipulated data can behave unpredictably, creating new risk channels. Action for businesses: Pair AI development with cybersecurity teams from day one. 4. Explainability and Transparency Are Now Strategic Priorities Black-box AI models make decisions that are hard to interpret. Regulators and clients alike demand explainable AI. Lack of transparency increases compliance risk Complex AI decisions without audit trails raise governance concerns 2026 strategy must include explainability standards, especially for systems impacting finance, healthcare, or personal data. 5. AI Governance Frameworks Are Critical Clear policies on data usage and model training Defined roles and responsibilities Risk assessment procedures Incident escalation paths for AI systems Documentation and auditability 6. The Human Factor Still Matters Most Most breaches still occur due to human error Employee social engineering remains a top attack vector Cultural training and awareness are essential Action for businesses: Invest in continuous cyber awareness training tailored to AI-related risks. 7. Collaboration Across Sectors Is No Longer Optional Businesses Governments Cybersecurity industry AI developers Academia Cyber Risk Lessons Every Business Must Apply Now Lesson 1: AI risk is systemic, not technical Lesson 2: Reactive cybersecurity is outdated Lesson 3: Governance and ethics must align How Lumiverse Solutions Helps Balance AI Innovation and Cyber Risk We help you innovate securely, not just quickly. Connect With Lumiverse Solutions Conclusion The 2026 AI Summit underscored a clear reality: AI innovation and cyber risk are two sides of the same coin. FAQ Section Q1. What was the key takeaway from the 2026 AI Summit regarding cybersecurity? ▾ The main takeaway was that AI innovation must be paired with strong cybersecurity governance. Businesses must balance rapid AI adoption with proactive risk management. Q2. How does AI increase cyber risk for businesses? ▾ AI can introduce risks such as automated attacks, deepfake fraud, data poisoning, and model manipulation if systems are not properly secured and monitored. Q3. Can AI improve cybersecurity defenses? ▾ Yes. AI enhances cybersecurity by enabling predictive threat detection, faster incident response, anomaly detection, and automated monitoring. Recent Posts February 24, 2026 AI Innovation vs Cyber Risk: What Businesses Must Learn from the 2026 AI Summit February 14, 2026 7 Cybersecurity Gaps Regulators Flag During VAPT Audits February 10, 2026 Why Vendor Risk Is the Biggest Compliance Failure in 2026 February 3, 2026 Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026: Why Continuous Audits Have Replaced Annual Checks January 21, 2026 From CSCRF to DPDP: The Growing Link Between Cybersecurity and Data Privacy in 2026 December 12, 2025 SEBI CSCRF Audit: Why You Must Be Ready For 2026 December 6, 2025 Why Every Business Needs a Red Team Assessment | Strengthening Cybersecurity November 27, 2025 What Is IRDAI ISNP Audit? A Simple Guide for Insurers November 18, 2025 Understanding DPDP 2025 Rules: Key Changes, Compliance Requirements, and Next Steps November 1, 2025 Top 10 VAPT Best Practices for 2025: What Organisations Should Be Doing Now Categories Cyber Security Security Operations Center Cloud Security Case Study Technology Trends Don’t Let Cyber Risks Disrupt Your Business Growth Certified Cybersecurity & Compliance Experts: 12+ years of industry experience delivering VAPT, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regulatory compliance aligned with global standards. Proven Real-World Cyber Expertise: 850+ cybercrime cases investigated and 1500+ cybersecurity audits conducted across enterprises and regulated industries. Strengthening People, Processes & Technology: 4500+ cybersecurity awareness sessions delivered to reduce human-layer risks and improve organizational cybersecurity. End-to-End Security Partner: From advanced penetration testing to global compliance frameworks, Lumiverse Solutions ensuring businesses stay secure, compliant, and confidently future-ready. Secure. Comply. Scale with Confidence. Book Your free Consultation → India: +91 77986 60940 / +91 7397 882 579 UAE: +971 58 585 6233 Tell Us Your Opinion We value your perspective! Share your thoughts, feedback, or questions below. Your opinion matters and helps create a richer, more engaging conversation. Let’s connect and hear what you think about this post!

AI Innovation vs Cyber Risk: What Businesses Must Learn from the 2026 AI Summit Read More »

7 Cybersecurity Gaps Regulators Flag During VAPT Audits

7 Cybersecurity Gaps Regulators Flag During VAPT Audits Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) has become a core regulatory requirement across industries in 2026. Regulators no longer view VAPT as a one-time technical exercise; they use it as a measure of an organization’s security maturity, governance, and remediation discipline. Despite regular testing, many organizations continue to receive adverse observations during regulatory and internal audits. The issue is rarely the absence of a VAPT report; it is the gaps revealed around how vulnerabilities are handled. This blog explains the seven most common cybersecurity gaps regulators flag during VAPT audits and why fixing them is critical for compliance and resilience. 1. Critical Vulnerabilities Left Unpatched The most frequent and serious gap is the presence of open critical or high-risk vulnerabilities. Known vulnerabilities left unresolved for months No defined patching timelines Lack of ownership for remediation In 2026, regulators expect time-bound closure, not just identification. Leaving critical issues open is treated as a governance failure, not a technical oversight. 2. VAPT Reports Without Remediation Evidence Many organizations submit VAPT reports but fail to provide proof of remediation. No screenshots or logs showing fixes No re-testing evidence No sign-off from system owners Regulators assess the full remediation lifecycle, not just the test results. Without closure evidence, vulnerabilities are considered unresolved. 3. Limited Scope of VAPT Testing Another major gap is incomplete VAPT coverage. Cloud environments are excluded APIs are not tested External-facing applications are missed Internal lateral movement is not assessed In 2026, regulators expect VAPT to cover all critical assets, including cloud, SaaS, APIs, and third-party integrations. 4. Repeat Findings Across Multiple VAPT Cycles Repeated vulnerabilities across consecutive VAPT audits signal deeper problems. This indicates: Weak root-cause analysis Temporary fixes instead of permanent remediation Poor secure development practices Regulators view repeat findings as a sign of ineffective security governance, even if testing is performed regularly. 5. Absence of Risk-Based Prioritization Not all vulnerabilities carry the same risk, yet many organizations treat them equally or ignore prioritization altogether. No risk scoring aligned with business impact Delayed remediation of exploitable vulnerabilities No linkage between vulnerabilities and critical systems In 2026, regulators expect a risk-based remediation approach, focusing first on vulnerabilities that impact sensitive data and core operations. 6. VAPT Performed as a Compliance Checkbox Regulators increasingly flag organizations that treat VAPT as a “tick-box” requirement. Same test methodology every year No contextual analysis of threats No alignment with incident trends or attack scenarios VAPT is expected to evolve with the threat landscape. Static testing models no longer meet regulatory expectations. 7. Weak Integration Between VAPT and Incident Response One of the most overlooked gaps is the lack of integration between VAPT findings and incident response planning. Vulnerabilities not mapped to attack scenarios Incident response plans not updated based on VAPT outcomes No tabletop exercises linked to identified risks In 2026, regulators expect organizations to use VAPT results to improve real-world attack readiness, not just security scores. Why These VAPT Gaps Matter More in 2026 Regulators now use VAPT audits to assess security accountability, response readiness, risk management maturity, and ongoing compliance discipline. Unresolved VAPT gaps increase the likelihood of regulatory observations, repeat audits, penalties, and operational disruptions. VAPT outcomes directly influence compliance confidence. Conclusion In 2026, regulators are not asking whether VAPT was conducted, they are asking how effectively vulnerabilities were managed. Addressing these seven common gaps can significantly reduce audit findings and strengthen cyber resilience. Strengthen Your VAPT Readiness in 2026 Connect with Lumiverse Solutions to strengthen your VAPT program, close audit gaps, and stay compliant throughout 2026. Connect With Lumiverse Frequently Asked Questions Q1. What is a VAPT audit? A VAPT audit evaluates an organization’s systems to identify security vulnerabilities and test how effectively they can be exploited by attackers. Q2. Why do regulators focus heavily on VAPT audits? Regulators use VAPT audits to assess real-world security readiness, remediation discipline, and an organization’s ability to prevent cyber incidents. Q3. What is the most common issue found during VAPT audits? The most common issue is critical vulnerabilities remaining unpatched despite being identified in previous assessments. Q4. Is performing VAPT enough for compliance in 2026? No. Regulators expect complete remediation, re-testing, and documented evidence, not just a VAPT report. Q5. How often should VAPT be conducted? Most organizations conduct VAPT annually, but regulators in 2026 expect more frequent testing, especially after major system or infrastructure changes. Q6. Do regulators check VAPT remediation evidence? Yes. Auditors review screenshots, logs, patch records, and re-test reports to confirm vulnerabilities are fully resolved. Q7. Why are repeat VAPT findings a red flag? Repeat findings indicate weak governance, ineffective root-cause analysis, and poor security control implementation. Q8. Does VAPT need to include cloud and APIs? Yes. In 2026, regulators expect VAPT to cover cloud environments, APIs, web applications, and external-facing systems. Q9. How does VAPT relate to incident response readiness? VAPT findings should be used to strengthen incident response plans and simulate realistic attack scenarios during drills. Q10. How can Lumiverse Solutions help with VAPT compliance? Lumiverse provides comprehensive VAPT, remediation tracking, re-testing, audit-ready documentation, and alignment with regulatory expectations. Recent Posts February 14, 2026 7 Cybersecurity Gaps Regulators Flag During VAPT Audits February 10, 2026 Why Vendor Risk Is the Biggest Compliance Failure in 2026 February 3, 2026 Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026: Why Continuous Audits Have Replaced Annual Checks January 21, 2026 From CSCRF to DPDP: The Growing Link Between Cybersecurity and Data Privacy in 2026 December 12, 2025 SEBI CSCRF Audit: Why You Must Be Ready For 2026 December 6, 2025 Why Every Business Needs a Red Team Assessment | Strengthening Cybersecurity November 27, 2025 What Is IRDAI ISNP Audit? A Simple Guide for Insurers November 18, 2025 Understanding DPDP 2025 Rules: Key Changes, Compliance Requirements, and Next Steps November 1, 2025 Top 10 VAPT Best Practices for 2025: What Organisations Should Be Doing Now October 29, 2025 How to Get STQC GIGW 3.0 Certification | Complete Audit & Compliance Process Explained Categories Cyber Security Security Operations

7 Cybersecurity Gaps Regulators Flag During VAPT Audits Read More »

Why Vendor Risk Is the Biggest Compliance Failure in 2026

Why Vendor Risk Is the Biggest Compliance Failure in 2026 In 2026, most compliance failures are no longer caused by internal system weaknesses alone. Instead, regulators across sectors are consistently identifying vendor and third-party risk as the single biggest reason organizations fail cybersecurity and data protection audits. From cloud service providers and SaaS platforms to IT support vendors and outsourced operations, businesses today depend heavily on third parties. While this improves efficiency, it also expands the attack surface often beyond direct control. This blog explains why vendor risk has become the top compliance failure in 2026, what regulators are actually checking, and how organizations must strengthen third-party governance. Why Vendor Risk Has Escalated in 2026 Modern organizations rarely operate in isolation. Core systems, data processing, monitoring, customer support, and analytics are frequently outsourced or cloud-based. Regulators have observed that: Many cyber incidents originate at vendors Breaches often involve shared credentials or unmanaged access Vendor security assessments are outdated or missing Organizations lack visibility into vendor environments As a result, regulators now treat vendor failures as organizational failures. What Regulators Expect for Vendor Risk in 2026 Across cybersecurity and data protection frameworks, vendor risk expectations have tightened significantly. Regulators now expect organizations to demonstrate: Clear identification of all third-party vendors Risk classification based on data access and system criticality Documented vendor security assessments Ongoing monitoring of vendor activities Defined accountability for vendor incidents Vendor governance is no longer a paperwork exercise; it must be operational and continuous. Common Vendor Risk Gaps Found During Compliance Audits Based on 2026 audit trends, the most frequent vendor-related gaps include: 1. No Formal Vendor Risk Classification Many organizations treat all vendors the same. Regulators expect vendors to be categorized as high, medium, or low risk based on access to systems and data. 2. One-Time or Outdated Vendor Assessments Vendor security checks are often performed only during onboarding. In 2026, auditors expect periodic reassessments, especially after system changes or incidents. 3. Unmonitored Vendor Access Common findings include: Shared credentials No MFA for vendor access Persistent access even after contract expiry Uncontrolled access is a major audit red flag. 4. Weak Contractual Cybersecurity Clauses Many contracts lack: Security control requirements Incident reporting timelines Audit rights Data handling obligations Contracts are now reviewed closely during audits. 5. No Vendor Incident Response Integration When incidents occur at vendors, organizations often lack: Clear escalation paths Incident notification timelines Joint response procedures This delays regulatory reporting and worsens impact. 6. Limited Visibility into Cloud and SaaS Vendors Organizations struggle to demonstrate: Where data is stored Who can access it How security is monitored This gap is especially critical for privacy compliance. Why Vendor Risk Directly Impacts Compliance Outcomes Vendor-related failures affect multiple compliance areas simultaneously: Cybersecurity resilience Incident reporting obligations Data protection requirements Audit evidence completeness Regulatory trust In 2026, even strong internal controls cannot compensate for weak vendor governance. What Businesses Must Do to Fix Vendor Risk in 2026 To remain compliant, organizations must move to continuous vendor risk management. Key actions include: Maintain an updated vendor inventory Classify vendors based on risk Perform periodic security assessments Enforce MFA and least-privilege access Monitor vendor activity through logs Update contracts with cybersecurity obligations Integrate vendors into incident response plans Maintain audit-ready evidence Vendor risk management must be treated as a core compliance function, not a procurement task. How Lumiverse Solutions Helps Manage Vendor Risk Lumiverse supports organizations with: Vendor risk gap assessments Third-party security evaluation frameworks Continuous monitoring and access governance VAPT for vendor-exposed systems Contractual cybersecurity requirement guidance Incident response integration for vendors Audit-ready documentation and reporting Lumiverse Solutions Pvt Ltd helps organizations reduce vendor-driven compliance failures and stay inspection-ready throughout the year. Conclusion In 2026, vendor risk is no longer a hidden issue; it is a leading cause of compliance failure. Regulators expect organizations to take full accountability for the security and data protection practices of their third parties. Organizations that proactively manage vendor risk will face fewer audit observations, faster incident response, and stronger regulatory confidence. Connect with Lumiverse Solutions to strengthen your vendor risk governance and avoid compliance failures in 2026. Recent Posts February 10, 2026 Why Vendor Risk Is the Biggest Compliance Failure in 2026 February 3, 2026 Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026: Why Continuous Audits Have Replaced Annual Checks January 21, 2026 From CSCRF to DPDP: The Growing Link Between Cybersecurity and Data Privacy in 2026 December 12, 2025 SEBI CSCRF Audit: Why You Must Be Ready For 2026 December 6, 2025 Why Every Business Needs a Red Team Assessment | Strengthening Cybersecurity November 27, 2025 What Is IRDAI ISNP Audit? A Simple Guide for Insurers November 18, 2025 Understanding DPDP 2025 Rules: Key Changes, Compliance Requirements, and Next Steps November 1, 2025 Top 10 VAPT Best Practices for 2025: What Organisations Should Be Doing Now October 29, 2025 How to Get STQC GIGW 3.0 Certification | Complete Audit & Compliance Process Explained October 22, 2025 RBI’s Compliance Crackdown: What Co-op Banks Can Learn from Recent Penalties Categories Cyber Security Security Operations Center Cloud Security Case Study Technology Trends Don’t Let Cyber Risks Disrupt Your Business Growth Certified Cybersecurity & Compliance Experts: 12+ years of industry experience delivering VAPT, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regulatory compliance aligned with global standards. Proven Real-World Cyber Expertise: 850+ cybercrime cases investigated and 1500+ cybersecurity audits conducted across enterprises and regulated industries. Strengthening People, Processes & Technology: 4500+ cybersecurity awareness sessions delivered to reduce human-layer risks and improve organizational cybersecurity. End-to-End Security Partner: From advanced penetration testing to global compliance frameworks, Lumiverse Solutions ensuring businesses stay secure, compliant, and confidently future-ready. Secure. Comply. Scale with Confidence. Book Your free Consultation → India: +91 77986 60940 / +91 7397 882 579 UAE: +971 58 585 6233 Tell Us Your Opinion We value your perspective! Share your thoughts, feedback, or questions below. Your opinion matters and helps create a richer, more engaging conversation. Let’s connect and hear what you think about this post!

Why Vendor Risk Is the Biggest Compliance Failure in 2026 Read More »

Continuous Audits

Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026: Why Continuous Audits Have Replaced Annual Checks

Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026: Why Continuous Audits Have Replaced Annual Checks Cybersecurity compliance has fundamentally changed in 2026. For most businesses, especially those operating in regulated sectors, annual audits are no longer enough. Regulators now expect continuous compliance, real-time visibility, and ongoing proof that security controls are actually working. Organizations that still treat cybersecurity audits as a once-a-year activity are increasingly exposed to regulatory action, audit observations, and operational risk. Why Annual Cybersecurity Audits Are No Longer Sufficient Traditional audits were designed for a slower digital environment. Today’s threat landscape moves far faster. Annual audits fail because: Threats evolve every day, not once a year New vulnerabilities emerge continuously Cloud, SaaS, and third-party dependencies change frequently Attackers exploit gaps between audit cycles Regulators have recognized this reality. As a result, compliance frameworks now focus on ongoing assurance, not point-in-time validation. What Regulators Expect from Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026 Across financial services, insurance, capital markets, and data-driven industries, regulators are aligned on one principle: cybersecurity must be continuously demonstrable. In 2026, regulators expect: Continuous monitoring of critical systems Real-time detection and alerting Regular vulnerability assessments with documented remediation Ongoing access reviews and privilege controls Evidence of active incident response readiness Continuous vendor and third-party risk oversight Compliance is no longer about policies alone, it is about operational proof. How Continuous Cybersecurity Audits Work in Practice Continuous audits do not mean constant disruption. Instead, they rely on automation, monitoring, and structured governance. Key components include: 1. Continuous Monitoring and Logging Organizations must maintain centralized logs, track user behaviour, and detect anomalies in real time. This allows immediate response rather than delayed discovery. 2. Ongoing Vulnerability Management Instead of annual VAPT, businesses now perform: Regular vulnerability scans Periodic penetration testing Continuous tracking of remediation status Auditors focus heavily on how quickly risks are identified and resolved. 3. Real-Time Incident Readiness Incident response plans are updated Teams are trained and ready Simulated drills are conducted Escalation paths are clearly defined Preparedness matters more than documentation. 4. Continuous Vendor Risk Assessment Vendor classification by risk Ongoing security reviews Access monitoring Contractual cybersecurity obligations A vendor’s failure is treated as your failure. Why Continuous Compliance Reduces Regulatory Risk Fewer audit observations Faster remediation of gaps Stronger cyber resilience Better visibility for leadership Reduced regulatory stress Most importantly, continuous compliance ensures there are no surprises during inspections. What Businesses Must Do to Adapt in 2026 Move from annual audits to ongoing assessments Implement continuous monitoring and SOC capabilities Automate evidence collection and reporting Integrate cybersecurity into daily operations Align cyber controls with data protection requirements Establish continuous vendor governance Compliance in 2026 is not a project, it is a process. How Lumiverse Solutions Supports Continuous Cybersecurity Compliance Cybersecurity gap assessments Continuous monitoring and SOC services VAPT and remediation tracking Incident response readiness and drills Vendor risk governance frameworks Compliance evidence management Our approach ensures you remain audit-ready throughout the year, not just during inspection periods. Conclusion Cybersecurity compliance in 2026 demands a shift in mindset. Annual audits are no longer enough to protect businesses from regulatory action or cyber threats. Continuous audits provide the visibility, resilience, and assurance regulators now expect. Build Continuous Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026 👉 Connect with Lumiverse Solutions to build a continuous cybersecurity compliance framework that keeps your organization secure, compliant, and confident throughout 2026. Book your free consultation FAQ: Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026 Q1. What is cybersecurity compliance in 2026? Cybersecurity compliance in 2026 means continuously demonstrating that security controls, monitoring, and governance are working, rather than proving compliance once a year through an annual audit. Q2. Why are annual cybersecurity audits no longer enough? Annual audits provide only a point-in-time view. In 2026, threats, systems, and vendors change too frequently, making continuous monitoring and regular assessments essential for compliance. Q3. What is meant by continuous cybersecurity audits? Continuous audits involve ongoing monitoring, frequent vulnerability assessments, real-time logging, incident readiness checks, and regular review of access and vendor risks throughout the year. Q4. Which organizations need continuous cybersecurity compliance? Any organization handling sensitive data or operating under regulatory oversight—such as BFSI, insurance, fintech, capital markets, and large enterprises—needs continuous compliance in 2026. Q5. What do regulators check during continuous compliance reviews? Regulators look for live evidence such as security logs, vulnerability remediation records, incident response readiness, vendor risk assessments, access reviews, and monitoring reports. Q6. How does continuous compliance reduce regulatory risk? Continuous compliance helps identify and fix gaps early, reduces audit observations, prevents last-minute remediation, and ensures organizations are always inspection-ready. Q7. Is continuous compliance more expensive than annual audits? While it may require upfront investment, continuous compliance often reduces long-term costs by preventing breaches, avoiding penalties, and minimizing repeated audit failures. Q8. How does continuous cybersecurity compliance support data protection laws? Continuous monitoring and governance help organizations meet data protection requirements by ensuring secure handling, timely breach detection, and proper access control for personal data. Q9. What role does SOC play in continuous compliance? A Security Operations Center (SOC) enables real-time monitoring, threat detection, alerting, and incident response making it a core requirement for continuous compliance in 2026. Q10. How can Lumiverse Solutions help with continuous cybersecurity compliance? Lumiverse provides gap assessments, SOC and monitoring services, VAPT, remediation tracking, vendor risk governance, and compliance support to help businesses stay audit-ready year-round. Recent Posts February 14, 2026 7 Cybersecurity Gaps Regulators Flag During VAPT Audits February 10, 2026 Why Vendor Risk Is the Biggest Compliance Failure in 2026 February 3, 2026 Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026: Why Continuous Audits Have Replaced Annual Checks January 21, 2026 From CSCRF to DPDP: The Growing Link Between Cybersecurity and Data Privacy in 2026 December 12, 2025 SEBI CSCRF Audit: Why You Must Be Ready For 2026 December 6, 2025 Why Every Business Needs a Red Team Assessment | Strengthening Cybersecurity November 27, 2025 What Is IRDAI ISNP Audit? A Simple Guide for Insurers November 18, 2025 Understanding DPDP 2025 Rules: Key Changes, Compliance Requirements, and Next Steps November 1, 2025 Top 10 VAPT Best

Cybersecurity Compliance in 2026: Why Continuous Audits Have Replaced Annual Checks Read More »